Prakash v. State by
Case brief
What is this about?
This is a criminal bail application under Section 483 BNS. The accused sought bail in a POCSO case where prosecution witnesses were examined. The High Court granted bail subject to strict conditions, including daily reporting.
What did the court decide?
Bail granted to the petitioner on a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties, subject to daily reporting and other specific conditions.
What the court decided
CRL O.P. No.15516 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated : 09.08.2024
CORAM
The Hon`ble Mr.Justice P.DHANABAL
CRL OP.No.15516 of 2024
Prakash S/o. Suppan ... Petitioner / Accused
Vs
State rep. by:-
The Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Tiruchengode, Namakkal District. ... Respondent [Cr. No.16 of 2023 in S.C. No.15 of 2024]
For Petitioner : Mr. K.R. Ramesh Kumar For Respondent : Mr. S. Vinoth Kumar Government Advocate [Criminal side]
PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec.483 of B.N.S.S.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to the accused petitioner despite the offence punishable under POCSO Act.
What conditions should be imposed for the release of the petitioner on bail.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Prakash S/o. Suppan
- respondent
State rep. by The Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Tiruchengode, Namakkal District.
Coram
P.DHANABAL
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court