Karthik v. the State Represtned
Case brief
What is this about?
The court dismissed the criminal petition for non-prosecution after the petitioner failed to deposit the directed amount and failed to appear or file representation despite prior notice.
The court dismissed the criminal petition for non-prosecution after the petitioner failed to deposit the directed amount and failed to appear or file representation despite prior notice.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Crl.O.P.No.13712 of 2024
P.DHANABAL, J.
Earlier this Court by order dated 08.07.2022 directed the petitioner to deposit a sum of Rs.7,00,000/- to the credit of Crime No.8 of 2024 within a period of two weeks and on such deposit, the defacto complainant is permitted to withdraw the said amount.
09.08.2024
drl
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner failed to comply with the earlier direction to deposit money, warranting dismissal for non-prosecution?
Non-named Petitioner
Non-named Respondent
Non-named Intervenor
P. DHANABAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court