Allowed

Prakash v. the State, Represented by

Madras HC16 Apr 2024CRL OP/1483/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Anticipatory bail sought in a case of alleged illegal transport of one unit of river sand under Sections 379 and 430 IPC. The petitioner volunteered to contribute to charity; the court granted anticipatory bail on conditions including a Rs.25,000 deposit, daily police reporting, and sureties.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted on bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties, Rs.25,000 charitable deposit, and conditions including daily police reporting.

Prakash Vs the State, Represented by — Anticipatory Bail | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

Crl.O.P.No.1483 of 2024

¶2

Crl.O.P.No.1483 of 2024

¶3

T.V.THAMILSELVI,J.

¶4

The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 379 and 430 of IPC in Crime No.357 of 2022, seeks anticipatory bail.

¶5

The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner is alleged to have transported one unit of river sand illegally. Hence, the complaint.

¶6

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that this is the second bail application. Earlier, the anticipatory bail was granted to the petitioner on 12.07.2022 in Crl.OP.No.16101 of 2022 and the petitioner was not able to comply with the conditions imposed by this Court, the same was automatically lapsed. However, on instructions, the learned counsel further submits that the petitioner without prejudice his rights, on his own volition, is ready and willing to contribute some amount to any charitable trust as may be directed by this Court and he prays to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

¶7

Page 1 of 4

¶8

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶9

Crl.O.P.No.1483 of 2024

¶10

Learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the

¶11

respondent submitted that the quantity of sand involved is one unit of river sand. He further submit that there is no previous case pending against the petitioner. However, he vehemently opposed for the grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

¶12

Taking into consideration the facts and the submissions made by both the counsels and also the fact that the petitioner without prejudice his rights, on his own volition, is ready and willing to contribute some amount to any charitable trust, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions.

¶13

6 . Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen (15) days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Valangaiman, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only), with two

¶14

Page 2 of 4

¶15

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶16

Crl.O.P.No.1483 of 2024

¶17

sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that:

¶18

(a)the petitioner is directed to deposit a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) to the credit of Advocate Clerk Association, Thiruvarur District, within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and shall produce the said receipt before the Court below.

¶19

(b)the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Court concerned may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity;

¶20

[c] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., until further orders;

¶21

[d] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial;

¶22

[e] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;

¶23

[f] on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/ Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the

¶24

T.V.THAMILSELVI, J.

¶25

Page 3 of 4

¶26

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶27

Crl.O.P.No.1483 of 2024

¶28

conditions has been imposed and the petitioner is released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji Vs. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560]; and;

¶29

drl

¶30

[g] if the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229-A IPC;

¶31

16.04.2024

¶32

drl

¶33

Crl.O.P.No.1483 of 2024

¶34

Page 4 of 4

¶35

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Prakash v. the State, Represented by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Prakash v. the State, Represented by

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kuppusamy Vs State by

M/S.Hotel Pentagon Inn Vs E.Sivakumar

M. Srinivsan Vs State Rep.by

Kamaraj Vs State Rep by

Ramanan Vs Inspector of Police

Ashok Barik Vs State Rep by