Kuppusamy v. State by
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioners sought anticipatory bail in an alleged offence of encroaching Government Natham land and laying stones. The court granted bail on arrest or appearance before the Judicial Magistrate, Omalur, with bond, sureties and reporting conditions.
What did the court decide?
Anticipatory bail granted on execution of Rs.10,000 bond each with two sureties, plus conditions including weekly reporting to respondent police for three months.
What the court decided
Crl.O.P.No.4806 of 2024
Crl.O.P.No.4806 of 2024
T.V.THAMILSELVI,J.
The petitioners, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 353 & 506(i) of IPC, in Crime No.22 of 2024, seek anticipatory bail.
- The case of the prosecution as per the defacto complainant is that
the petitioners encroached on the Government Natham Land and laid a stone illegally. Hence, the complaint.
- Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are in no way connected with the alleged offence as stated by the prosecution. He further submits that the first petitioner, a retired VAO, has given 1200 sq.ft to the Commissioner, Omalur Union through a gift deed dated 12.09.2011. Now the defacto complainant wants to take back 5 extra feet of land apart from the specified land, due to which, the present complaint has been given by the defacto complainant and they have been falsely implicated in this case. Hence, he prays to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.
- Learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the
Page 1 of 4
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Should anticipatory bail be granted to the petitioners apprehending arrest for alleged encroachment on Government Natham land under Sections 353 and 506(i) IPC?
Coram
T.V.Thamilselvi
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court