Petition seeking cancellation of bail granted to respondents 2 to 5, alleging non-compliance with bail conditions. Respondents contended they were complying and the petition was filed to harass them. Finding no merits and noting compliance, the Court dismissed the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Crl.O.P.No.13717 of 2024
P.DHANABAL, J.
When the matter was taken up for hearing today, both the counsels are present. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the respondents 2 to 5 are not complying with the conditions as ordered by this Court. On the other hand, the learned counsel appearing for the private respondents and the learned Public Prosecutor would submit that the respondents are complying with the conditions without fail and this petition was filed only to harass the respondents.
04.09.2024
ssa
1 issue framed by the court
Whether bail granted to respondents 2 to 5 should be cancelled for non-compliance with the conditions imposed by the Court.
P. Dhanabal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
