Disposed

Gowtham v. The Sub Inspector of Police

Madras HC10 Jan 2024CRL MP(MD)/253/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioners in an anticipatory bail matter sought extension of time to furnish sureties as required by the Court's order dated 21.11.2023. The Court extended the time by two weeks, failing which the anticipatory bail would stand automatically vacated.

What did the court decide?

Time to comply with surety conditions extended by two weeks; on default, anticipatory bail stands automatically vacated.

Gowtham Vs The Sub Inspector of Police — Anticipatory Bail | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

CRL MP(MD) No.253 of 2024

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶3

Wednesday, the Tenth day of January Two Thousand and Twenty Four

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

The Hon`ble Mr.Justice M.DHANDAPANI

¶6

CRL MP(MD) No.253 of 2024 IN CRL OP(MD) No.20847 of 2023

1 GOWTHAM

2 VANARASU

3 PONNUCHAMY

4 CHINNAKARUPPU 5 VASANTH PERIYASAMY

¶11

6 KALAISELVAM

¶12

7 KARUPPU @ KARUPIAH ... Petitioners / Petitioners

¶13

¶14

THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE ELUMALAI POLICE STATION, MADURAI DISTRICT. (CRIME NO.189 OF 2023.) ... Respondent / Respondent

¶15

Criminal Miscellaneous Petition filed praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the petition filed therewith the High Court may be pleased to extend the time made in Crl.OP(MD)No.20487/2023 dated 21.11.2023 by this Honble Court.

¶16

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶17

1/3

¶18

CRL MP(MD) No.253 of 2024

¶19

Order : This criminal miscellaneous petition coming up for orders on this day, upon perusing the petition filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/s.A.SARAVANAN, Advocate for the petitioners and of Mr.SS.MADHAVAN, Government Advocate (Crl. side) on behalf of the Respondent, the court made the following order:-

¶20

This petition is filed to extend the time granted in Crl.O.P(MD)No.20847 of 2023 dated 21.11.2023.

¶21

2.The learned counsel for the petitioners seek time to comply the condition imposed upon the petitioner, since they are unable to execute sureties with in the stipulated time as per the order, dated 21.11.2023.

¶22

3.In view of the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, time granted by this Court, vide order dated 21.11.2023 is extended finally for a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order, failing which, the anticipatory bail already granted to the petitioner shall stand automatically vacated.

sd/10/01/2024

/ TRUE COPY /

/01/2024

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S. I / II / III /IV) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

¶27

GNS

¶28

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶29

2/3

¶30

CRL MP(MD) No.253 of 2024

¶31

¶32

1.The Judicial Magistrate No.II, Usilampatti.

¶33

2.Do through the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madurai District. 3.The Sub Inspector of Police, Elumalai Police Station, Madurai District.

¶34

4.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

¶35

+1 CC to M/s.A.SARAVANAN, Advocate ( SR-495[I] dated 10/01/2024 )

¶36

ORDER IN CRL MP(MD) No.253 of 2024 IN CRL OP(MD) No.20847 of 2023 Date :10/01/2024

¶37

ED/ JGB /SAR- (19/01/2024) 3P / 6C

¶38

Madurai Bench of Madras High Court is issuing certified copies in this format from 17/07/2023

¶39

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶40

3/3

Gowtham v. The Sub Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Gowtham v. The Sub Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Basant Lal Sharma Vs The Joint Director of Police

Devaraj @ Koilpitchai Devaraj Vs The Inspector of Police

Karunakaran @ Karuna Vs The Inspector of Police

Kendai @ Gajendran Vs The Inspector of Police

Balasubramaniyan Vs The Inspector of Police

Manimegalai Vs The Inspector of Police