Venkatesan v. State Rep.by
Case brief
What is this about?
Petition filed to amend the details of the Court before which bail was sought. The Court permitted the amendment and directed the registry to issue a fresh order copy.
What did the court decide?
Amendment permitted; fresh order copy to be issued; time extended for executing sureties till 08.05.2024.
What the court decided
Crl.M.P.No.6870 of 2024 in Crl.O.P.No.6568 of 2024
C.V.KARTHIKEYAN, J.
This petition has been filed seeking to amend the satisfaction Court as Judicial Magistrate No.I, Thiruvallur, instead of Judicial Magistrate No.II, Thiruvallur, in the order passed in Crl.O.P.No.6568 of 2024 dated 25.03.2024.
2.Heard both sides.
3.Considering the submission, this amendment petition is ordered as prayed for.
4.The Registry is directed to carry out necessary amendment in the petition seeking anticipatory bail in Crl.O.P.No.6568 of 2024 and also issue fresh order copy in order dated 25.03.2024.
5.Since amendment had been ordered today, time is extended for executing sureties till 08.05.2024.
24.04.2024
smv
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petition should be amended to specify the satisfaction Court as Judicial Magistrate No.I, Thiruvallur?
Coram
C.V. Karthikeyan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court