Petition to condone a 13-day delay in filing a criminal revision. The Additional Public Prosecutor raised no objection; the delay was condoned and the Registry was directed to number the revision and post it along with a related revision by the co-accused.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Crl.M.P.No.3094 of 2024 in Crl.R.C.SR.No.1752 of 2024
M. NIRMAL KUMAR, J
This petition is filed to condone the delay of 13 days in filing the above revision.
2.Heard the learned Counsel for petitioner.
3.Mr.S.Raja Kumar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor takes notice for the respondent and he has got no objection in allowing this petition.
4.Being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the delay stands condoned and the petition is ordered.
5.It is submitted that co-accused in this case has filed a revision before this Court with similar prayer in Crl.R.C.No.1339 of 2023.
6.Registry is directed to number the Criminal Revision, if it is otherwise in order and post the same along with Crl.R.C.No.1339 of 2023.
07.03.2024
rsi
M. Nirmal Kumar, J
Respondent
M. Nirmal Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
