This short order dismissed Criminal Miscellaneous Petitions as withdrawn by the accused's counsel, who intended to file appropriate petitions under a different provision of the Criminal Procedure Code.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
R.T.No.1 of 2022
Crl.M.P.Nos.15499 and 15500 of 2024 in Crl.A.No.532 of 2022
S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J. AND M.JOTHIRAMAN, J.
Mr.R.Sankarasubbu, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the accused would submit that the petitions in Crl.M.P.No.15500 of 2024 and Crl.M.P.No.14599 of 2024 were filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. for examining the mental condition of the accused during the relevant point of time when the offense was committed. However, the learned State Public Prosecutor raised an objection that no such petitions are entertainable under Section 482 of Cr.P.C.
3.Recording the submission of the learned counsel for the accused, the Criminal Miscellaneous Petitions are dismissed as withdrawn.
(S.M.S., J.) (M.J.R., J.) 13.11.2024 (1/2)
msv
Page No:1/2
R.T.No.1 of 2022
S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J. AND M.JOTHIRAMAN, J.
msv
Crl.M.P.Nos.15499 and 15500 of 2024 in Crl.A.No.532 of 2022
13.11.2024
Page No:2/2
1 provisions across 1 enactments
S.M.Subramaniam
M.Jothiraman
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
