Allowed
J.S.Santhoshini v. D.Sankar Kumar
Madras HCCRL MP/13324/2024
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Defacto complainant sought impleadment as respondent in a pending criminal revision petition. The State opposed, arguing the dispute was between the State and the revision petitioner. Court held the defacto complainant must necessarily be impleaded and ordered the petition.
What did the court decide?
Defacto complainant impleaded as respondent; Registry directed to carry out necessary amendment.