Petition to condone 943 days delay in filing an appeal. No objection from respondents 3 and 4 despite service of notice; delay condoned and petition allowed, with appeal directed to be numbered and listed for admission.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Crl.M.P.No.11877 of 2024 in Crl.A.SR.No.39549 of 2024
M. NIRMAL KUMAR, J.
This petition is filed to condone the delay of 943 days in filing the above appeal.
2.Heard the learned counsel for petitioner.
3.It is seen that private notice sent to the respondents 3 and 4 has been served and their names have been printed in the cause list. Despite the same, there is no representation on behalf of the respondents 3 and 4 either in person or through their counsel. It appears that the respondents 3 and 4 have got no serious objection in allowing this petition.
4.In view of the same, the delay stands condoned and the petition is ordered.
03.10.2024
rsi
Note: Registry is directed to number the Criminal Appeal, if it is otherwise in order and post the same for Admission on 16.10.2024.
M. Nirmal Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
