The court dismissed the criminal appeal for non-prosecution due to the appellant's failure to appear despite multiple listing dates.
null
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Crl.A.No.286 of 2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 14.03.2024
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE Mrs. JUSTICE R.KALAIMATHI
Crl.A.No.286 of 2013
S.Venkatachalam
...Appellant/Complainant
vs.
PRAYER : Criminal Appeal is filed under Section 378 of Criminal Procedure Code to set aside the judgment of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court at Magisterial Level-II, Coimbatore passed on 15.02.2023 in S.T.C.No.106 of 2012.
For Appellant : No Appearance For Respondents : For R1 : No Appearance For R2 : Mr.M.Sivavarthanan
1/3
Crl.A.No.286 of 2013
JUDGMENT
. There is no representation for the appellant. When the matter came up on 02.02.2024, 15.02.2024, 29.02.2024 and 07.03.2024, there was no representation for the appellant. Hence, the matter is listed today under the caption “for dismissal”.
14.03.2024
Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No Speaking Order/Non-Speaking Order Neutral Citation Case : Yes/No mac
To
2/3
Crl.A.No.286 of 2013
R.KALAIMATHI, J.
mac
Crl.A.No.286 of 2013
14.03.2024
3/3
1 provisions across 1 enactments
S.Venkatachalam
M/s.Om Sakthi Enterprises
Mrs.C.Jothilakshmi
R.KALAIMATHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
