Criminal appeal against an acquittal was withdrawn by the appellant's counsel through a memo with endorsement; the High Court recorded the withdrawal and dismissed the appeal as withdrawn, with no costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 15.03.2024
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE R.KALAIMATHI
Crl.A.No.272 of 2012
G.Sivashanmugam
... Appellant
Versus
1.Shanmugam Proprietor, Sree Subramaniam and Company, Keerani, Anumanthakudi Post, Devakottai Via, Sivagangai District - 623 303.
2.Shanmugam
.. Respondents
Prayer: Criminal Appeal is filed under Section 378 (4) of Cr.P.C., to set aside the order made in C.C.No.361 of 2011 by the Judicial Magistrate, Fast Track Court at Magisterial Level-II, Coimbatore dated 31.01.2012.
For Appellant : Mr. A.R.Rithik Sushil, for Mr. K. Thilageswaran
For Respondents : No Appearance.
JUDGMENT
Today when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel
for the appellant has filed a Memo dated 15.03.2024 and stating that he is withdrawing this Criminal Appeal. He has also made an endorsement to
that effect.
2
withdrawn. No costs.
15.03.2024
Index : Yes/No Speaking order : Yes/No Neutral Citation Case : Yes/No
klt
To
3
R.KALAIMATHI,J.
klt
Crl.A.No.272 of 2012
15.03.2024
G.Sivashanmugam
Shanmugam Proprietor, Sree Subramaniam and Company
Shanmugam
R.Kalaimathi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
