Rajendran v. Sivakumar
Case brief
What is this about?
According to the Additional Public Prosecutor, the contemnor has complied with the earlier court order and filed a negative final report. On recording this submission, the court closes the contempt petition. It directs the respondent to issue an RCS notice to the petitioner to enable him to file a protest petition before the concerned Judicial Magistrate.
What did the court decide?
Direction to respondent to serve RCS notice to petitioner to file protest petition with Judicial Magistrate.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Cont.P.(MD)No.665 of 2024
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 19.06.2024
CORAM :
THE HON`BLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI
Cont.P.(MD)No.665 of 2024
Rajendran
... Petitioner
Vs.
Mr.Sivakumar, The Inspector of Police, Gandamanur Vilakku Police Station, Theni District. (Crime No.30 of 2022) ... Respondent
Prayer : Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Court Act, to punish the contemnor / respondent for willfully and deliberately disobeying the order of this Court made in Crl.O.P.(MD) No.15555 of 2023 dated 07.09.2023.
For Petitioner : Mr.V.Pandiyan For Respondent : Mr.T.Senthil Kumar, Additional Public Prosecutor.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Rajendran
- respondent
Mr. Sivakumar, Inspector of Police
Coram
B. PUGALENDHI
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court