The petitioner filed a contempt petition under Section 11 to punish the Superintendent Engineer for allegedly disobeying a prior order dated 12.10.2023. The court recorded the contemnor's submission that the order was complied with and closed the petition.
The contempt petition was closed on recording that the impugned order was complied with.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Cont.P.(MD).No.2613 of 2023
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 27.11.2024
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI
Cont.P.(MD)No.2613 of 2023
M.Rajkumar Pandian
... Petitioner
-vs-
A.Sagaya Raj, Superintendent Engineer, Electricity Distribution Circle, TANGEDCO, Theni.
... Contemnor
PRAYER: Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Court Act, 1971 to call the contemnor for having wilfully and wantonly disobeyed the order passed by this Court in W.P.(MD). No. 16951/2023 dated 12.10.2023 and punish the contemnor in accordance with law.
For Petitioner : Mr.G.Thiruvarutselvan For Contemnor : Mr.B.Ramanathan Standing Counsel
1/4
Cont.P.(MD).No.2613 of 2023
ORDER
The instant contempt petition has been filed alleging violation of the order of this Court dated 12.10.2023 passed in W.P.(MD). No. 16951/2023.
2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the
order of this Court 12.10.2023 passed in W.P.(MD). No. 16951/2023 has been complied with. Recording the same, this contempt petition stands closed.
27.11.2024 NCC : Yes/No (2/2) Index : Yes / No sm
2/4
Cont.P.(MD).No.2613 of 2023
To
3/4
Cont.P.(MD).No.2613 of 2023
L.VICTORIA GOWRI, J.
sm
Order made in Cont.P.(MD)No.2613 of 2023 (2/2)
Dated: 27.11.2024
4/4
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner's claim that the order in W.P.(MD). No. 16951/2023 was violated warranting contempt proceedings under Section 11 of the Contempt of Court Act, 1971, stands true on the facts.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
M.Rajkumar Pandian
A.Sagaya Raj
L. VICTORIA GOWRI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
