This writ petition sought writ of certiorari and mandamus to quash an order dismissing the petitioner's request to complete 3rd year BL after 14-17 years. With no petitioner representation and lacking provision for late completion, the court dismissed the petition.
Writ of certiorari and mandamus dismissed. Connected miscellaneous petition closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.(MD)No.6646 of 2022
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 26.11.2024
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI
W.P.(MD)No.6646 of 2022 and W.M.P.(MD)No.5127 of 2022
V.Senthilkumar
... Petitioner
Vs.
Chennai - 600 028.
... Respondents
1/4
W.P.(MD)No.6646 of 2022
PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records relating to the impugned order passed by the 4th respondent in Na.Ka.No.1709/A4/2021 dated 25.02.2021 and quash the same as illegal and consequently directing the 4th respondent to admit the petitioner in Madurai Law College and continue the Law College Course.
For Petitioner : No representation For Respondents : Mr.T.Amjad Khan (R1 & R3) Government Advocate Mr.K.P.Krishnadoss (R2 & R4) Standing Counsel
ORDER
The petitioner's request to retain 3rd year BL after a period of 14 years came to be dismissed on 25.02.2021. Challenging the same, this writ petition came to be filed.
2. When the matter is called, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner for the second time.
3. As of now, nearly 17 years have elapsed.
2/4
W.P.(MD)No.6646 of 2022
4.
4. The learned government advocate appearing for the respondents 1 and
3 categorically submits that there is no provision to permit the petitioner to redo his 3rd year BL after a period of 17 years.
5. Recording the same, this writ petition is dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
26.11.2024
NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Sm
TO :-
3/4
W.P.(MD)No.6646 of 2022
L.VICTORIA GOWRI, J.
Sm
Order made in W.P.(MD)No.6646 of 2022
Dated 26.11.2024
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner can be admitted to complete 3rd year BL after a lapse of 17 years.
V.Senthilkumar
The State of Tamilnadu
The Registrar, The Tamil Nadu Dr.Ambedkar Law University
The Director of Legal Studies
The Principal, Government Law College, Madurai
LVICTORIA GOWRI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
