Disposed

A.Mohamed Ali Jinnah v. Dr.Darez Ahamed IAS

Madras HC6 Nov 2024CONT P(MD)/2352/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Contempt petition alleging non-compliance with an earlier order directing consideration of representations about alleged illegal administration of Emaneswaram Muslim Jamath. Since a later writ petition had directed conclusion of the enquiry within four weeks, the contempt petition was closed.

What did the court decide?

None; contempt petition closed with liberty to pursue remedy under the 25.10.2024 order.

A.Mohamed Ali Jinnah Vs Dr.Darez Ahamed IAS — Cooperative Societies | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

Cont.P.(MD)No.2352 of 2024

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 06.11.2024

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI

¶6

Cont.P.(MD)No.2352 of 2024 in W.P.(MD)No.5914 of 2024

A.Mohamed Ali Jinnah

... Petitioner

versus

Dr.Darez Ahamed, I.A.S., Chief Executive Officer, Tamilnadu Wakf Board, No.1, Jaffar Sirang Street, Vallal Seethakathi Nagar, Chennai – 1.

¶11

Nijamudeen Superintendent of Wakfs, O/o. The Superintendent of Wakfs, No.159/3, Therppa Sayanam Road, Velipattinam, Ramanathapuram.

¶12

Mansoor, Inspector of Wakfs, O/o. The Superintendent of Wakfs, No.159/3, Therppa Sayanam Road, Velipattinam, Ramanathapuram.

¶13

... Respondents

¶14

Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of Contempt of Courts Act, to punish the respondents 1 to 3 for their willful disobedience of the order of this Court dated 12.03.2024 in W.P.(MD)No.5914 of 2024.

¶15

¶16

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶17

Cont.P.(MD)No.2352 of 2024

¶18

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Rja Mohamed For Respondents : Mr.K.Jeyamohan

¶19

ORDER

¶20

This Contempt Petition is filed alleging that the order of this Court dated 12.03.2024 passed in W.P.(MD)No.5914 of 2024 has not been complied with.

¶21

The petitioner has approached this Court by way of filing a writ petition in W.P.(MD)No.5914 of 2024 for a Mandamus, directing the 1^st respondent to consider his representations dated 03.01.2024, 09.01.2024 and 16.02.2024, that there is an illegal administration in the affairs of Emaneswaram Muslim Jamath, Paramakudi, Ramanathapuram District.

¶22

This Court, by order dated 12.03.2024, disposed of the writ petition, recording the submissions made by the learned counsel appearing for the Wakf Board that based on the petitioner's representations, they have contemplated an enquiry and the enquiry was held on 11.03.2024 and after hearing other parties, necessary orders would be passed. This Court has not issued any direction to the respondents to complete the enquiry within a

¶23

2/4

¶24

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶25

Cont.P.(MD)No.2352 of 2024

¶26

stipulated time. In the meantime, it appears that the petitioner has filed another writ petition for the very same relief through another counsel in W.P.(MD)No.25474 of 2024 and this Court, by order dated 25.10.2024, disposed of the writ petition with a direction to the respondent to conclude the enquiry within a period of four weeks.

¶27

The learned counsel for the Wakf Board, who takes notice for the respondents, submits that the petitioner has not co-operated for enquiry and he did not appear for enquiry on 15.10.2024. He further submits that a further notice was issued to the petitioner for his appearance on 19.11.2024.

¶28

In view of the subsequent order passed by this Court in W.P. (MD)No.25474 of 2024 dated 25.10.2024, this Contempt Petition is closed with liberty to the petitioner to workout his remedy in the order passed by this Court in W.P.(MD)No.25474 of 2024, dated 25.10.2024.

¶29

06.11.2024

¶30

ogy NCC : Yes / No. Index : Yes / No. Internet : Yes / No.

¶31

3/4

¶32

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶33

Cont.P.(MD)No.2352 of 2024

¶34

B.PUGALENDHI, J.

¶35

ogy

¶36

Cont.P.(MD)No.2352 of 2024

¶37

06.11.2024

¶38

4/4

¶39

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

A.Mohamed Ali Jinnah v. Dr.Darez Ahamed IAS

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

A.Mohamed Ali Jinnah v. Dr.Darez Ahamed IAS

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kamaraj.B Vs the Superintending Engineer

Dr.M.Madan Kumar, Vs the Registrar (I/C)

P.Pandaram, Vs the Managing Director

Dr.Myrtle Grace.T Vs the Vice Chancellor

Priya, D/O.Ganesan Vs the Superintendent of Police

P. Murugan, S/O. Poolpandi, Vs the Director General of Police