Petitioner challenged a charge sheet via Article 226 writ petition. Counsel submitted the enquiry was completed and petitioner was exonerated. Court closed the petition without adjudicating merits.
None granted; matter closed as enquiry completed petitioner exonerated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP(MD)No.9153 of 2019
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 05.11.2024
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI
WP(MD)No.9153 of 2019 and WMP(MD)Nos.7128, 7129 of 2019
P.Pandaram
.. Petitioner
v.
Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Tirunelveli) Ltd., Tirunelveli Division,
Tirunelveli.
2.The General Manager,
Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Tirunelveli) Ltd., Tirunelveli Division, Tirunelveli.
.. Respondents
PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India
seeking issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records relating to the impugned charge sheet dated 26.09.2016 in No. 12768/SA-07/Ozhungu/Tha.Aa.Poka/2016, on the file of the second
1/4
WP(MD)No.9153 of 2019
respondent and the impugned charge sheet dated 26.09.2016 in No. T13000-
Sa.7-O.Na.Pi-Tha.A.Poka.Thili-16, on the file of the second respondent, quash the same in the light of the petitioner being retired from service on 30.09.2016 and consequently, directing the respondents to issue Settlement order along with all retirement benefits, including disbursement of full pension.
For Petitioner : Mr.K.R.Laxman For Respondents : No appearance
ORDER
This writ petition is filed as against a charge memo.
2.When the writ petition is taken up for hearing, learned Counsel for the petitioner submitted that the enquiry was completed and that the petitioner was exonerated from the charges. Therefore, nothing survives for further adjudication in this writ petition.
2/4
WP(MD)No.9153 of 2019
3.Recording the said submission, this writ petition stands closed. No
costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
Index : Yes / No 05.11.2024 NCC : Yes / No Internet : Yes gk
3/4
WP(MD)No.9153 of 2019
B.PUGALENDHI, J.
gk
WP(MD)No.9153 of 2019
05.11.2024
4/4
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a writ petition challenging a charge sheet needs adjudication when the petitioner is exonerated and retired.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
P.Pandaram
The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Tirunelveli) Ltd., Tirunelveli Division, Tirunelveli
The General Manager, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Tirunelveli) Ltd., Tirunelveli Division, Tirunelveli
B.PUGALENDHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
