Petitioner reported respondent for disobedience of a previous court order. Court informed that the order has been complied with and closed the contempt petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Cont.P(MD)No.1048 of 2024
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 20.06.2024
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN
Cont.P(MD)No.1048 of 2024 in W.P(MD)No.1131 of 2015
Jothilakshmi ... Petitioner / Petitioner
Vs.
Ramakrishnan, Tahsildar, Vilathikulam, Thoothukudi District. ... Contemnor/ 3rd Respondent
PRAYER: Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, to punish the respondent for his willful and wanton disobedience of the order passed by this Court in W.P(MD)No.1131 of 2015 dated 09.08.2023 under the contempt of courts act.
For Petitioner : Mr.C.Jeganathan
For Respondent : Mr.K.Balasubramani Special Government Pleader
1/3
Cont.P(MD)No.1048 of 2024
ORDER
The learned counsel on either side inform the Court that the order
passed by this Court has been complied with.
2.This Contempt Petition is closed.
20.06.2024 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No NCC : Yes / No MGA
To The Tahsildar, Vilathikulam, Thoothukudi District.
2/3
Cont.P(MD)No.1048 of 2024
G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J.
MGA
Cont.P(MD)No.1048 of 2024 in W.P(MD)No.1131 of 2015
20.06.2024
3/3
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Jothilakshmi
Ramakrishnan
G.R.Swaminathan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
