Disposed

S.Maharajan v. a.Raja

Madras HC19 Jun 2024REV.APLW(MD)/111/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Review of a writ petition direction for land survey. The court noted a pending civil suit and patta in favour of the writ petitioner, directed the Tahsildar to pass a speaking order on the review petitioner's objection with six weeks' time to seek civil court relief, and disposed of the review.

What did the court decide?

Tahsildar directed to pass speaking order on objection; six weeks' window for civil court relief; survey authorities bound by civil court outcome.

S.Maharajan Vs a.Raja — Property and Title | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

REV APLW(MD).No.111 of 2024

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 19.06.2024

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN

¶6

REV.APLW(MD)No.111 of 2024 in W.P(MD)No.5607 of 2024 and W.M.P(MD)Nos.11425, 11427 & 11429 of 2024

¶7

S.Maharajan ... Petitioner / Third Party

¶8

¶9

1.A.Raja ... 1^st Respondent/ Petitioner 2.The Tahsildar, Aathur Taluk, Dindigul District. 3.The Firka Surveyor, Aathur Taluk, Dindigul District. 4.S.Angurathinam ... Respondents 2 to 4/ Respondents 1 to 3

¶10

1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶11

REV APLW(MD).No.111 of 2024

¶12

PRAYER: Review Application filed under Order XLVII Rule 1 and 2 read with Section 141 of Civil Procedure Code to set aside the order dated 08.03.2024 passed in W.P(MD)No.5607 of 2024 and allow the Review Application.

¶13

For Petitioner : Mr.T.Sakthi Kumaran

¶14

For Respondents : Mr.K.Balasubramani Special Government Pleader for R.2 & R.3

¶15

ORDER

¶16

Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondents 2 and 3.

¶17

2.The first respondent herein filed W.P(MD)No.5607 of 2024 for

¶18

conducting survey. The said writ petition was disposed of by issuing usual directions. Seeking review of the said order, the present Review Application has been filed.

¶19

3.I wanted to know if the writ petitioner is having patta in his favour.

¶20

The learned Special Government Pleader answered affirmative and also

¶21

2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶22

REV APLW(MD).No.111 of 2024

¶23

produced copy of the patta. It is seen that the parties are already filed O.S.No.3 of 2024 on the file of Principal District Muncif Court, Athur. It is not in dispute that the petitioner has already given objection before the second respondent. The second respondent shall pass a speaking order on the petitioner's objection. If the petitioner's objections are over-ruled, the petitioner will still be given six weeks breathing time. The petitioner can move the jurisdictional civil Court during the said period and obtain relief. If any such Interlocutory Application is filed by the petitioner, it shall be disposed of by the learned trial Magistrate within a period of four weeks thereafter. The survey authorities will abide by the outcome of the order to be passed by the jurisdictional civil Court. I am more than satisfied that the directions given by this Court protect the rights of the petitioner herein.

¶24

4.This Review Application is disposed of accordingly. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

¶25

19.06.2024

¶26

Index :Yes/No Internet:Yes/No NCC :Yes/No MGA

¶27

3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶28

REV APLW(MD).No.111 of 2024

¶29

G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J.

¶30

MGA

¶31

¶32

1.The Tahsildar, Aathur Taluk, Dindigul District.

¶33

2.The Firka Surveyor, Aathur Taluk, Dindigul District.

¶34

Copy to

¶35

The Principal District Muncif Court, Athur.

¶36

REV.APLW(MD)No.111 of 2024 in W.P(MD)No.5607 of 2024 and W.M.P(MD)Nos.11425, 11427 & 11429 of 2024

¶37

19.06.2024

¶38

4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

S.Maharajan v. a.Raja

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

S.Maharajan v. a.Raja

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Al.Ct.Arunachalam Vs The District Collector

Suman Thankaian Vs The Regional Passport Officer

Meenakshi Sundaram Chettiar. S Vs The Revenue Divisional Officer

O.Avudaithai Vs N.Sankaran

C.Pechiyammal Vs The District Collector

M.Murugan Vs The Revenue Divisional Officer