M.Meena v. Abdul Rahman
Case brief
What is this about?
Contempt petition filed for disobedience of an earlier order. Respondent argued the impugned case was closed by the trial court due to limitation. Court closed the contempt petition.
What did the court decide?
Contempt petition closed.
What the court decided
Cont P(MD) No.1012 of 2024
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 11.07.2024
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN
Cont P(MD) No.1012 of 2024
M.Meena ... Petitioner/Petitioner Vs. Mr.Abdul Rahman, The Inspector of Police, Vallathirakottai Police Station, Pudukkottai District, Pudukkottai. (Crime No.189 of 2021) ... Contemnor/2nd Respondent
PRAYER : Contempt Petition is filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Court Act, 1970, to punish the respondents herein for his willful disobedience of the
order passed by this Court in Crl.O.P.(MD).No.17370 of 2022, dated 29.09.2022.
For Petitioner :Mr.I.Joshua M/s.Ajmal Associates
For Respondent :Ms.M.Aasha
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
M.Meena
- respondent
Mr.Abdul Rahman
Coram
G.ILANGOVAN
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court