K.a.Gopinath v. Mr.J.Radhakrishnan IAS and 2 others
Case brief
What is this about?
In this contempt petition, the petitioner sought punishment for willful disobedience of a prior court order. The court found that the respondent had complied with the direction via a subsequent order, closing the petition without awarding costs.
What did the court decide?
Contempt petition is closed; no costs awarded.
What the court decided
Cont.P.No.837 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 26.09.2024
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.SOUNTHAR
Cont.P.No.837 of 2024
K.A.Gopinath ... Petitioner
Vs.
1.Mr.J.Radhakrishnan, I.A.S., The Commissioner Greater Chennai Corporation Ripon Buildings, 53, Raja Muthiah Road, Periamedu, Chennai-600 03.
2. E.Chinnadurai The Zonal Officer Greater Chennai Corporation Zone-3, No.1, Thattankulam street, Bazaar street, Madhavaram, Chennai.
3. R.Kumar The Assistant Executive Engineer, Chennai Greater Corporation Division-28 Arulnagar Main Road, Madavaram, Chennai. ....Respondents
1/4
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the contempt petition should proceed given that the impugned order has been complied with.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
K.A.Gopinath
- respondent
Mr.J.Radhakrishnan, I.A.S.
- respondent
E.Chinnadurai
- respondent
R.Kumar
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court