P.Veerapandiyan, v. Manoj Kumar Jain
Case brief
What is this about?
The petitioner filed a contempt petition alleging willful disobedience of a prior judgment directing payment of interest. The parties informed the court that the directed 9% interest had been settled. The contempt petition was closed with no costs.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2024:MHC:3535
CONT.P.No.2142 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 04.10.2024
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM
CONT.P.No.2142 of 2024 in
W.P.No.27944 of 2016
P.Veerapandiyan
... Petitioner
Vs.
Mr.Manoj Kumar Jain Chairman and Managing Director, M/s.Madras Fertilizers Limited, Manali, Chennai – 600 068.
... Respondent
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the respondent willfully disobeyed the orders passed by this Court in W.P.No.27944 of 2016 dated 17.10.2022.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
P. Veerapandiyan
- respondent
Mr. Manoj Kumar Jain Chairman and Managing Director, M/s. Madras Fertilizers Limited, Manali, Chennai – 600 068
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court