A contempt petition was listed for being mentioned at the instance of the respondent's counsel seeking clarification or modification of an earlier order. The court found nothing to clarify and declined the request.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CONT P NO. 3201 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 30-01-2025
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE S. S. SUNDAR AND
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P. DHANABAL
CONT P NO. 3201 of 2024
High court Madras, Madras - 600 104.
Petitioner(s)
Vs
R. Anandan, and 10 others
No. 19, Rudrappa Achari Street, Choolai, Chennai - 112. and 10 Others
Contemnor(s)
For Petitioner(s): Mr.P.M.Subramaniam, Senior Counsel assisted by M/s.N.K.Kanthimathi
For Contemnor(s):
Mr.P.Suresh Babu for Mr.C.Senthil Kumar for R1 and R4 in C.M.P.No.25420 of 2023
notice returned unserved for respondent 1and 2 (he and she got a married and living a sepretaly got a married and living a sepretaly present residential address not known)
notice returned unserved for respondent 3 (no such door number 15 in sait mohan lal sowar street)
notice returned unserved for respondent 6, 8,9 & 10( no such persons)
notice returned unserved for respondent 11 (vacated)
notice served for r5 - S.K. NEELAMEGAN, Residing at No. 11, Dasspuram, Chetpet, Chennai - 600 031.
notice sent service awaited for r4 and r7
notice unserved for respondent (no such person )
notice service awaited for respondent 7
ORDER
(Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble S.S.Sundar J.)
Today, the matter is listed under the caption “for being mentioned” at the instance of the
learned counsel for the respondent.
2.From the submissions of the learned counsel for the respondent, this Court finds that
there is nothing to be clarified or modified. Therefore, the request of the learned counsel
for the respondent is declined.
(S.S.SUNDAR J.) (P.DHANABAL J.) 30-01-2025
MKN
High Court Madras
S.S. Sundar
P. Dhanabal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
