Ramraj v. the Tahsildar
Case brief
What is this about?
The court condoned a 224-day delay in filing a Writ Appeal under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, finding the petitioner's explanation satisfactory and noting the respondent had no serious objection.
What did the court decide?
Delay of 224 days in filing Writ Appeal condoned.
What the court decided
C.M.P.No.23628 of 2024 in W.A.SR.No.95873 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 21.11.2024
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.S. SUNDAR
AND
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. DHANABAL
C.M.P.No.23628 of 2024
in
W.A.SR.No.95873 of 2024
Ramraj
... Petitioner
Vs.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay of 224 days in filing the Writ Appeal can be condoned under Section 5 of the Limitation Act?
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Ramraj
- respondent
The Tahsildar, Omalur Taluk Office, Salem District
Coram
S.S. SUNDAR
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court