Contempt petition alleging wilful disobedience of an earlier writ order; both sides reported compliance and production of the petitioner's appointment order. The court recorded the submission and closed the contempt petition along with the connected application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Contp.No.2805 of 2024 and Sub Appl.No.891 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated : 19.11.2024
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR
Cont.P.No.2805 of 2024
and Sub Appl.No.891 of 2024
S.Krishnan
... Petitioner
Vs.
1.Rajesh Lakani,
The Chairman and Managing Director, Tamil Nadu Electricity Generation & Distribution Corporation, Chennai – 600 002.
2.K.Mozhiarasi The Chief Engineer (Personnel), Tamil Nadu Electricity Generation & Distribution Corporation, Chennai – 600 002. ... Respondents
Contempt petition is filed under Section 11 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, to punish the respondents for their wilful disobedience of the order passed by this Court in W.P.No.18806 of 2022 dated 26.09.2023 and committed Contempt of Court made under Section 2(b) of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.
1/4
Contp.No.2805 of 2024 and Sub Appl.No.891 of 2024
For Petitioner : Dr.A.E.Chelliah, Senior counsel for Mr.C.Vasanthakumari Chelliah For Respondents : Mr.K.Rajkumar Standing Counsel
ORDER
Dr.A.E.Chelliah, learned S enior counsel for Mr.C.Vasanthakumari
Chelliah, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.K.Rajkumar, learned Standing Counsel submitted that the order of this Court dated 26.09.2023 made in W.P.No.18806 of 2022, has been complied with and the appointment order of the petitioner has been produced before this Court.
2.Recording the submission made by the learned Senior counsel
appearing for the petitioner as well as the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents, this Contempt Petition stands closed. Consequently, connected application also closed.
19.11.2024
rst
2/4
Contp.No.2805 of 2024 and Sub Appl.No.891 of 2024
N.SATHISH KUMAR, J.,
r st
3/4
Contp.No.2805 of 2024 and Sub Appl.No.891 of 2024
Cont.P.No.2805 of 2024 and Sub Appl.No.891 of 2024
19.11.2024
4/4
2 provisions across 1 enactments
S.Krishnan
Rajesh Lakani
K.Mozhiarasi
N.Sathish Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
