Disposed

S.Balamurugan v. Suthamathi

Madras HC11 Mar 2024CMSA(MD)/5/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madras High Court disposed of a Civil Miscellaneous Second Appeal and connected civil miscellaneous petition. The court recorded a compromise filed by both parties regarding a sum of money and mutual consent for divorce. The appeal was disposed of, and the couples were directed to file a separate divorce petition on mutual consent if desired.

What did the court decide?

The Civil Miscellaneous Second Appeal is disposed of on the terms of the recorded compromise. Parties are at liberty to file a petition for divorce on mutual consent.

S.Balamurugan Vs Suthamathi — Matrimonial and Divorce | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

C.M.S.A(MD)No.5 of 2020

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATE : 11.03.2024

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.MURALI SHANKAR

¶6

C.M.S.A(MD)No.5 of 2020 and C.M.P.(MD)No.3304 of 2024

¶7

S.Balamurugan : Appellant/Appellant/Petitioner Vs. Suthamathi : Respondent/Respondent/Respondent

¶8

Prayer : This Civil Miscellaneous Second Appeal filed under Section 28 of Hindu Marriage Act r/w Section 100 of C.P.C., to set aside the judgment and decree, dated 18.10.2019 made in HMCMA.No.5 of 2015 on the file of the learned Additional District Judge, Sivagangai, confirming the judgment and decree, dated 27.07.2015 made in H.M.O.P.No.151 of 2010 on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Sivagangai.

¶9

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Srinivasa Raghavan For Respondent : Mr.R.Senthil Kumar

¶10

1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶11

C.M.S.A(MD)No.5 of 2020

¶12

ORDER

¶13

The Civil Revision is directed against the judgment and decree, dated 18.10.2019 made in HMCMA.No.5 of 2015 on the file of the learned Additional District Judge, Sivagangai, confirming the judgment and decree, dated 27.07.2015 made in H.M.O.P.No.151 of 2010 on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Sivagangai.

¶14

The learned counsel on either side would submit that the respondent has received a demand draft for a sum of Rs.65,00,000/- and they have also filed a petition for compromise.

¶15

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and also the learned counsel for the respondent. Both parties are present before this Court and the terms of compromise are read over and explained to them and both of them admitted the same as true and correct.

¶16

The said compromise memo is recorded. The Civil Miscellaneous

¶17

Second Appeal is disposed of in terms of compromise. Both parties are at liberty to file a petition for divorce on mutual consent and if such an

¶18

2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶19

C.M.S.A(MD)No.5 of 2020

¶20

application is filed, the appropriate Court is directed to take the same on file, if it is otherwise in order and proceed further in accordance with law.

¶21

In view of the above, this Civil Miscellaneous Second Appeal is

¶22

disposed of. Consequently, C.M.P.(MD)No.3304 of 2024, is ordered. No costs.

¶23

11.03.2024

¶24

NCC :Yes/No Index :Yes/No Internet : Yes/ No das

¶25

¶26

1.The Subordinate Judge, Sivagangai.

¶27

2.The Additional District Judge, Sivagangai.

¶28

3.The Section Officer, VR Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

¶29

3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶30

C.M.S.A(MD)No.5 of 2020

¶31

K.MURALI SHANKAR,J.

¶32

DAS

¶33

C.M.S.A(MD)No.5 of 2020 and C.M.P.(MD)No.3304 of 2024

¶34

Dated : 11.03.2024

¶35

4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

S.Balamurugan v. Suthamathi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

S.Balamurugan v. Suthamathi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Palanichamy Vs R.Jason Srinivasan

Azhagumalai Vs the Assistant Executive ENGINEeR

V.Irulappan Vs the District Revenue Officer

Amutha.M Vs the Commissioner

Karuppanan, Vs Perumal Naicker

Indumathi Vs the Tahsildar