Petitioner sought temporary injunction restraining alienation of suit property pending appeal against dismissal of its specific performance suit. Court held the petitioner had no subsisting right in the property and any alienation would be subject to Section 52 Transfer of Property Act; petition dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.M.P.No.9619 of 2024 in
A.S.No.297 of 2024
R.SUBRAMANIAN, J. and R.SAKTHIVEL, J.
The prayer in this petition runs as follows:-
"to grant temporary injunction, restraining the respondents, their agents, assignees, men, any person, organisation or entity acting through them or on their behalf, from alienating, dealing with or creating any encumbrance over the Schedule Property hereunder being the subject matter of O.S.No.160 of 2016 on the file of the II Additional District Court at Salem pending disposal of the above appeal. "
(R.S.M., J.) (R.S.V., J.) 04.06.2024
dsa
1/3
2/3
R.SUBRAMANIAN, J. and R.SAKTHIVEL, J.
dsa
C.M.P.No.9619 of 2024 in A.S.No.297 of 2024
04.06.2024
3/3
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a temporary injunction against alienation should be granted pending appeal after the specific performance suit was dismissed.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
R. Subramanian
R. Sakthivel
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
