The Single Judge, Chennai High Court, condoned the delay in filing an appeal despite the absence of the second respondent, and ordered the petition duly. No substantive issue decided.
Delay in filing the appeal is condoned.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.M.P.No. 8680 of 2024 and
C.M.A.Sr.No.33568 of 2024
R.SUBRAMANIAN, J. and
R.SAKTHIVEL, J.
Despite notice to the 2nd respondent, he is not appearing either is person or through counsel, duly instructed.
2.Accepting the reasons assigned in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, this petition is ordered, the delay in filing the appeal is condoned.
(R.S.M., J.) (R.S.V., J.) 05.07.2024
kkn
1/1
Petitioner
R. Subramanian
R. Sakthivel
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
