Disposed
The Branch Manager v. Seshadri
Madras HCCMP/5282/2024
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
2024 and C.M.A.Sr.No.162813 of 2023…
What the court decided
AI extract
Outcome
¶1
C.M.P.No. 5282 of 2024 and
¶2
C.M.A.Sr.No.162813 of 2023
¶3
R.SUBRAMANIAN, J. and
¶4
R.SAKTHIVEL, J.
¶5
Despite notice, the 2nd
¶6
respondent is not appearing either is person or through counsel, duly instructed.
¶7
2.Accepting the reasons
¶8
assigned in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, this petition is ordered, the delay in filing the appeal is condoned.
¶9
3.Registry is directed to print the
¶10
name of the learned counsel, Mr.T.K.Saravanan for the 1st respondent while the appeal is listed for admission.
¶11
kkn
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- respondent
1st Respondent
- respondent
2nd Respondent
Coram
AI extract
R.SUBRAMANIAN
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court