Petitions to condone a 216-day delay in representing two appeals. Respondent's counsel raised no objection; the court accepted the reasons in the supporting affidavit, condoned the delay, directed numbering of the appeals and posting for admission after steps against the legal heirs of the first respondent.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.M.P.Nos.8623 and 8625 of 2023
in A.S.Nos.338 and 339 of 2018
SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP, J.
This Petition has been filed to condone
the delay of 216 days in representing the C.M.P.S.R.No.104756 and 104754 of 2021.
legal heirs of the deceased Respondent-1.
13.11.2024
shl
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay of 216 days in representing the CMPs should be condoned.
Sathi Kumar Sukumara Kurup
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
