The court held that the petitioner, as the legal representative of the daughter of the first wife, is a necessary party to the main appeal. Accordingly, the compound motion for amendment in the cause title was allowed, directing the Registry to effect the necessary amendment.
C.M.P.No.8524 of 2024 allowed, Registry directed to amend cause title
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
C.M.P.No.8524 of 2024 in A.S.No.742 of 2019
RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN,J.,
The petitioner herein is the proposed second respondent as L.R. of Sanjeevi Naidu, the daughter of the first wife. Hence, she is a necessary party in the main appeal.
18.07.2024
nvi
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the proposed second respondent as L.R. of Sanjeevi Naidu needs to be added as a necessary party
PETITIONER
SANJEEVI NAIDU
RMT TEEKAA RAMAN J
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
