Rajeswari v. Krishnaveni
Case brief
What is this about?
CMP filed in an appeal against a preliminary decree; since a final decree had already been passed in the underlying suit, the court held no further order was needed and closed the CMP.
What the court decided
1
C.M.P.No.3580 of 2023 in A.S.No.70 of 2023
RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN,J.,
The learned counsel for the respondents stated that this Appeal Suit is filed against the preliminary decree. The plaintiff has already filed I.A.No.2 of 2020 for passing of final decree in O.S.No.157 of 2016. The final decree has been passed by this Court on 28.06.2024. Hence, I find that, since the final decree has already been passed, there is no order required in the above C.M.P.
- Accordingly, C.M.P.No.3580 of 2023 is closed.
18.07.2024
nvi
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether any order was required in the CMP seeking interim relief when the final decree had already been passed in the underlying suit.
Coram
Teekaa Raman
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court