The High Court passed a lump-sum order condoning a delay of 1145 days in filing an appeal, accepting the explanation of a communication gap due to the death of the applicants' advocate.
Delay of 1145 days in filing the appeal was condoned and application was allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.M.P.No.8277 of 2023 in W.A.SR.No.44465 of 2023
C.M.P.No.8277 of 2023 in W.A.SR.No.44465 of 2023
THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE
and D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J.
Heard Mr.C.P.Sivamohan, learned counsel for
Mr.R.Rajamahendran, learned counsel for the applicants and Mr.P.Muthukumar, learned State Government Pleader for the non-applicants.
Page 1 of 3
C.M.P.No.8277 of 2023 in W.A.SR.No.44465 of 2023
has died and as such, there was a communication gap. The papers could not be received and it is only from the legal heirs of the deceased advocate of the applicants, the papers came to be handedover to the applicants.
appeal is condoned. Accordingly, the application stands allowed and is disposed of.
(S.V.G., CJ.) (D.B.C., J.) 08.01.2024
drm
Page 2 of 3
C.M.P.No.8277 of 2023 in W.A.SR.No.44465 of 2023
THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE and D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J.
(drm)
C.M.P.No.8277 of 2023 in W.A.SR.No.44465 of 2023
08.01.2024
Page 3 of 3
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay of 1145 days in filing the appeal should be condoned.
Applicants
State Government
THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE
D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
