The petitioner filed a public interest writ petition under Article 226 seeking directions to prevent the shifting of a TASMAC shop. The Court dismissed the petition without appreciating its merit.
The writ petition is dismissed with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.No.130 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 08.01.2024
CORAM :
THE HON'BLE MR.SANJAY V.GANGAPURWALA, CHIEF JUSTICE
AND
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY W.P.No.130 of 2024
G.Thangaraj .. Petitioner
Vs.
Rep. by its Managing Director 4th Floor, CMDA Tower
Gandhi Irwin Bridge
Egmore, Chennai – 600 008.
Page 1 of 5
W.P.No.130 of 2024
.. Respondents
Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of mandamus, directing the respondents herein to take necessary and immediate action towards not to shift the TASMAC shop No.3830 situated in S.No.615/2C(1) at Kothal Rave Village, Dharapuram Taluk, Tiruppur District without following the due process of law by considering the petitioner's representation dated 01.11.2023.
For the Petitioner : Mr.W.Camyles Gandhi For the Respondents : Mr.P.Muthukumar
State Government Pleader for R1 & R2
Mr.K.Balakrishnan for R3
ORDER
(Made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice)
Heard Mr.W.Camyles Gandhi, learned counsel for the petitioner,
Mr.P.Muthukumar, learned State Government Pleader for respondents
1 and 2 and Mr.K.Balakrishnan, learned counsel for respondent 3.
Page 2 of 5
W.P.No.130 of 2024
shop should not be directed to be shifted.
no order as to costs.
(S.V.G., CJ.) (D.B.C., J.) 08.01.2024 Index : Yes/No Neutral Citation : Yes/No
drm
Page 3 of 5
W.P.No.130 of 2024
To
Page 4 of 5
W.P.No.130 of 2024
THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE AND D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J.
(drm)
W.P.No.130 of 2024
08.01.2024
Page 5 of 5
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court should exercise writ jurisdiction to direct the respondents to prevent the shifting of a TASMAC shop.
G. Thangaraj
The State of Tamil Nadu
The District Collector
TASMAC Ltd.
Regional Manager
District Manager
Sanjay V. Gangapurwala
D. Bharatha Chakravarthy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
