The High Court of Madras dismissed the first appeal as abated because the first appellant was deceased and no steps were taken to bring the legal heirs on record. No costs were awarded.
The appeal was dismissed as abated. No costs awarded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 08.04.2024
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R. SUBRAMANIAN
AND
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. SAKTHIVEL
A.S. No. 521 of 2011
Vs.
Prayer: First Appeal filed under Order XLI Rule 1 read with Section 96
of Civil Procedure Code as against the judgment and decree dated 27.04.2011 passed in O.S. No. 149 of 2008 by the learned Additional District Judge, (FTC II), Cuddalore.
R. SUBRAMANIAN,J.
AND
R. SAKTHIVEL,J.
nv
For Appellants :: Mr.T.S. Baskaran
For Respondents :: Mr.R. Gururaj
J U D G M E N T
(Delivered by R. Subramanian,J.)
When the appeal is taken up, it is stated that the 1st appellant is no more. No steps have been taken to bring the legal heirs on record. Hence, the appeal stands dismissed as abated. No costs.
(R.S.M.J.) (R.S.V.J.) nv 08.04.2024
To The 1st Addl. District Court, (FTC II), Cuddalore.
A.S. No. 521 of 2011
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appeal stands dismissed as abated due to the death of one appellant without bringing legal heirs on record.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Paneerselvam @ Nellappan
Murugavel
Amsavalli
Rajeshwari
R. Subramanian
R. Sakthivel
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
