Dismissed
M.Subramani v. Jadayan
Madras HCCMP/5052/2024
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Court condoned a 94-day delay in filing Second Appeals by way of Common Motion Petitions. Registered counsel appearance for sole respondent.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
1
¶2
C.M.P.Nos.5052 and 5072 of 2024
¶3
in S.A.SR.Nos.138090 and 138091 of 2023
¶4
RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN,J.,
¶5
These petitions have been filed to condone the delay of 94 days in filing the above Second Appeal.
¶6
- Heard both sides.
¶7
3.Having satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of these petitions, the delay of 94 days is condoned.
¶8
- Accordingly, C.M.P.Nos.5052 and 5072 of 2024 are ordered.
¶9
- Mr.N.Manoharan, learned counsel undertakes to file vakalath for the sole respondent in C.M.P.No.5072 of 2024.
¶10
- The Registry is directed to print the name of Mr.N.Manoharan, learned counsel appearing for the sole respondent in C.M.P.No.5052 of 2024 at the time of admission.
¶11
04.04.2024
Coram
AI extract
RMT. TEEKAA RAMAN J.
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court