Petition to condone an 82-day delay in filing an appeal under Section 5 of the Limitation Act. Respondent raised no objection and sufficient reasons were shown; the court condoned the delay and directed the Registry to number the appeal for admission.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.M.P.No.25198 of 2024 IN O.S.A.SR.No.148274 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 06.12.2024
CORAM
THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE S.S.SUNDAR AND THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE P.DHANABAL
C.M.P.No.25198 of 2024 IN O.S.A.SR.No.148274 of 2024
S.P.Meena .. Petitioner
Vs.
S.Palaniappan Chettiar .. Respondent
Civil Miscellaneous Petition filed under Order XIV Rule 8 of O.S. Rules read with Section 5 of the Limitation Act, praying to condone the delay of 82 days in filing the above appeal.
For Petitioner : Ms.C.Sivanesan For Respondent : Ms.A.Nilaphar
O R D E R
(Made by S.S.SUNDAR, J.)
This petition is filed to condone the delay of 82 days in filing the above
appeal.
1/3
C.M.P.No.25198 of 2024 IN O.S.A.SR.No.148274 of 2024
no objection in allowing this petition.
satisfaction of this Court, this Court is inclined to condone the delay.
order and post the appeal 'for admission'.
[S.S.S.R.,J.] [P.D.B., J.]
06.12.2024
gya
2/3
C.M.P.No.25198 of 2024 IN O.S.A.SR.No.148274 of 2024
S.S.SUNDAR, J. AND P.DHANABAL, J.
gya
C.M.P.No.25198 of 2024 IN O.S.A.SR.No.148274 of 2024
06.12.2024
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay of 82 days in filing the appeal should be condoned.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
S.P. Meena
S. Palaniappan Chettiar
S.S. Sundar
P. Dhanabal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
