Petitions to condone a 612-day delay, set aside abatement caused by the death of the first petitioner, and bring the legal heirs on record as appellants 3 to 6 in Second Appeal No.853 of 2017. The court allowed the petitions with no representation for the respondent.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CMP Nos.25213, 25217 & 25218 of 2024 in S.A.No.853 of 2017
CMP Nos.25213, 25217 & 25218 of 2024 in S.A.No.853 of 2017
R. HEMALATHA, J.
These petitions are filed (i) to condone the delay of 612 days in filing the petition to set-aside the order of abatement caused due to the death of the first petitioner (ii) to set-aside the order of the abatement caused due to the death of the first petitioner (iii) to bring on record the legal heirs of the deceased first petitioner and rank them as appellants 3
to 6, respectively in the above appeal.
2. There is no representation for the respondent.
3. Having satisfied with the reasons assigned in the affidavit filed
in support of these petitions, these petitions are allowed.
4. The Registry is directed to carryout necessary amendments in the
Second Appeal No.853 of 2017 and list the same for final hearing after
two weeks.
21.11.2024
vum
1/2
CMP Nos.25213, 25217 & 25218 of 2024 in S.A.No.853 of 2017
R. HEMALATHA, J.
vum
CMP Nos.25213, 25217 & 25218 of 2024 in S.A.No.853 of 2017
21.11.2024
2/2
1 issue framed by the court
Should the delay of 612 days in filing the petition to set aside abatement be condoned and the legal heirs of the deceased first petitioner brought on record in the appeal?
R. Hemalatha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
