The High Court condoned a 93-day delay in filing a Second Appeal, accepting the appellant's explanation that the certified copy of the lower court judgment was delayed. The court allowed the appeal to be numbered and listed for hearing.
Condonation of 93 days delay in filing Second Appeal; matter to be numbered and posted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.M.P. No. 15142 of 2024
in
S.A.SR.No.66485 of 2024
C.M.P. No. 15142 of 2024 in S.A.SR.No.66485 of 2024
T.V. THAMILSELVI, J.
This petition has been filed seeking to condone the delay of 93 days in filing the above Second Appeal against the judgment and decree dated 31.10.2023 passed in A.S.No.15 of 2018, on the file of Sub-Court at Perambalur confirming the judgment and decree passed in O.S.No.526 of 1995 dated 28.06.2017 on the file of District Munsif Court, Perambalur.
C.M.P. No. 15142 of 2024 in S.A.SR.No.66485 of 2024
and post the matter on 25.11.2024.
11.11.2024
rpp
C.M.P. No. 15142 of 2024 in S.A.SR.No.66485 of 2024
T.V.THAMILSELVI, J.
rpp
C.M.P.No. 15142 of 2024 in S.A.SR.. No. 66485 of 2024
11.11.2024
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay of 93 days in filing the Second Appeal due to late receipt of certified copies is condonable under the circumstances.
T.V. THAMILSELVI
Unknown Person
T.V. THAMILSELVI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
