Second appeal against a concurrent decree in a property suit was dismissed as abated, both parties having died and no legal representative steps taken; liberty granted to the appellant to seek restoration.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Second Appeal No.1344 of 2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 07.03.2024
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN
Second Appeal No.1344 of 2013
1.Padma Ammal 2.Narasimhan 3.Vijayakumar …. Appellants -VsA.Subramanian …. Respondent
Prayer : Second Appeal under Section 100 of C.P.C., against the judgment and decree dated 12.08.2013 made in A.S.No.66 of 2012 on the file of the learned Additional Subordinate Court, Cuddalore confirming the judgment and decree dated 31.08.2012 made in O.S.No.162 of 2010 on the file of the learned Additional District Munsif's Court, Cuddalore.
For Appellants : Ms.R.Meenal For Respondent : Mr.R.Gururaj
J U D G M E N T
Learned counsel for the appellants has filed a memo dated 04.03.2024
stating that the appellants 2 and 3 are no more.
1 / 2
Second Appeal No.1344 of 2013
V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN, J.
KST
07.03.2024
Index : Yes/No Neutral Citation : Yes/No Speaking Order / Non-speaking order KST To 1.The Additional Subordinate Judge, Cuddalore. 2.The Additional District Munsif, Cuddalore.
S.A.No.1344 of 2013
2 / 2
Padma Ammal
Narasimhan
Vijayakumar
A. Subramanian
V. Lakshminarayanan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
