The court condoned a delay of 387 days in filing an appeal on the basis of an accompanying affidavit. The application was allowed and disposed of, and the registry was directed to include the non-applicants' counsel name in the appeal record.
Delay of 387 days in filing the appeal is condoned.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.M.P.No.14159 of 2023 in W.A.SR.No.44460 of 2023
THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE and D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J.
Heard Mr.N.Paul Sunder Singh, learned counsel for the applicants and Mrs.P.Srividhya, learned counsel for the non-applicants.
This application is filed to condone the delay of 387 days in filing the appeal.
For the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit, the delay of 387 days in filing the appeal is condoned. Accordingly, the application stands allowed and is disposed of.
Registry is directed to print the name of Mrs.P.Srividhya, learned counsel for the non-applicants in the appeal.
drm
The Applicants
The Non-Applicants
The Hon'ble Chief Justice
D.Bharatha Chakravarthy, J.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
