The Court disposed of the writ petition by holding that the issues were already decided in a previous Division Bench judgment dated 28.4.2023. The parties were bound by that earlier order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.No.6164 of 2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 11.01.2024
CORAM :
THE HON'BLE MR.SANJAY V.GANGAPURWALA, CHIEF JUSTICE
AND
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY
W.P.No.6164 of 2018
G.Anbazhagan
.. Petitioner
vs
3.The Chairman, Tamilnadu Housing Board, 493, Anna Salai, Nandanam, Chennai-600 035.
4.The Chairman cum Managing Director, Tamilnadu Electricity Board, N.P.K.R.R. Maaligai, No.144, Anna Salai, Chennai-600 002.
Page 1 of 6
W.P.No.6164 of 2018
9 th
5.The Director of Collegiate Education, Office of Director of Collegiate Education, 9th Floor, EVK Sampath Buildings, College Road, Chennai-600 006.
6.Pachaiyappa's Trust Board, rep. by its Secretary, Pachaiyappa's Trust Board Office, Pachaiyappa's College, Chennai-600 030.
6.M/s.Muhurtham Event Management Company Pvt. Ltd., Anna Arangam, Dr. Gurusamy Road, Chetpet, Chennai-600 031.
.. Respondents
Prayer : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the respondent 1 and 2 to take appropriate action upon the petitioner's representation dated 7.3.2018 and 8.3.2018 and to directing the respondents 1 to 5 to take appropriate action against the illegal construction of commercial usage at institutional zone.
For the Petitioner : Mr.D.Jaganathan
For the Respondents : Ms.C.N.Vinobha for respondent No.1
___________ Page 2 of 6_
W.P.No.6164 of 2018
ORDER
(Order of the court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice)
We have heard Mr.D.Jaganathan, learned counsel for the petitioner; Ms.C.N.Vinobha, learned counsel for the first respondent; Mr.D.B.R.Prabhu, learned counsel for the second respondent; Mr.D.Veerasekaran, learned counsel for the third respondent; Mr.L.Jaivenkatesh, learned counsel for the fourth respondent; Mr.P.Muthukumar, learned State Government Pleader for the fifth respondent; and, Mr.K.V.Sundararajan, learned counsel for the sixth respondent.
Page 3 of 6
W.P.No.6164 of 2018
been taken into consideration and decided in O.S.A.Nos.17, 81, 128 and 222 of 2022 under the judgment and order dated 28.4.2023 by a Division Bench of this Court.
that SLP is filed and the same is pending.
(S.V.G., CJ.) (D.B.C., J.) 11.01.2024 Index : Yes/No Neutral Citation : Yes/No bbr
Page 4 of 6
W.P.No.6164 of 2018
To
Page 5 of 6
W.P.No.6164 of 2018
THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE AND D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY,J.
bbr
W.P.No.6164 of 2018
11.01.2024
___________ Page 6 of 6_
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the illegal construction of commercial usage at institutional zone requires action by the respondents.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
G. Anbazhagan
The Member Secretary, Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority
The Commissioner, Corporation of Chennai
The Chairman, Tamilnadu Housing Board
The Chairman cum Managing Director, Tamilnadu Electricity Board
The Director of Collegiate Education
Sanjay V. Gangapurwal
D. Bharatha Chakravarthy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
