7. It is now stated by the petitioner/appellant that the 16th respondent has purchased the property, pending the Second Appeal from the 15th respondent and thereafter, the 17th respondent, in and by an order of the NCLT has taken over the assets including the suit property from the 16th respondent. Having allowed the 15th respondent to be impleaded, I see no reason why the 16th & 17th respondents should not be impleaded in the present Second Appeal. In fact, it would be in the interests of the 16th and 17th respondents to be parties at the time of final hearing of the Second Appeal so that, their interests are adequately protected and in fact, the apprehension of the Learned Counsel for the respondents that the 2nd respondent may collude or not effectively defend the appeal are all issues that can be taken care of, if the present owner, namely the 17th respondent is brought on record. Therefore, I feel that the applications are to be ordered, in the interests of justice and impleading the 16th respondent and the 17th respondent who has became the present owner in view of NCLT proceedings and they would be proper and necessary parties in the Second
