Civil miscellaneous appeal under the Motor Vehicles Act challenging a motor accident claims tribunal award was dismissed for default because the appellant failed to take steps against the deceased vehicle owner's legal heirs, without whose presence the appeal could not proceed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.M.A.(MD)No.818 of 2012
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
Dated: 21.02.2024
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P. DHANABAL C.M.A.(MD)No.818 of 2012
Mahalingam Mudaliar(Died)
Vs.
Prayer : This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 to set aside the fair and decreetal order dated 20.02.2012 made in MCOP No.75 of 2008 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal(Principal District and Sessions Judge)Virudhunagar at Srivilliputhur.
For Appellants : Mr.S.Srinivasa Raghavan For R-1& 2 : Mr.P.Sepna Sree For R-3 : Mr.S. Baskar Mathuram For R-5 : Mr.S. Moorthy
C.M.A.(MD)No.818 of 2012
JUDGMENT
Already owner of the vehicle/R4 died and no steps was taken. R4 is the main party and without his presence the petition cannot be disposed of effectively.
21.02.2024
NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No Internet: Yes/No aav
To:
2.The Record Keeper, Vernacular Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
C.M.A.(MD)No.818 of 2012
P. DHANABAL,J.
aav
C.M.A.(MD)No.818 of 2012
21.02.2024
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Mahalingam Mudaliar (Died)
Ramasamy
Vanniappan
Muniandi
Lakshmi
P.Kadalkani
P. Dhanabal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
