14.According to the appellant/first respondent the First Information Report was registered after 10 days from the date of accident and thereby creates doubts about the genuineness of the First Information Report. In this context the learned counsel appearing for the appellant/first respondent contended that immediately after the accident both the respondents approached the first respondent/petitioner and they assured to give compensation, thereby complaint was not given immediately. Since the respondent have not amenable for amicable settlement, thereafter complaint was given and First Information Report was registered. After registration of the First Information Report the matter was investigated by the investigation officer and thereafter final report was filed. Merely because the complaint was given with delay, it cannot be stated that it creates doubt. Other circumstances have also to be looked into. In this case, the appellant/first respondent has not adduced any evidence to rebut the evidence on the side of the first respondent /petitioner, thereby the evidence on the petitioner side is reliable and acceptable. P.W.1 categorically deposed about the date of accident and the employment under the first respondent through second respondent. Therefore mere delay in registration of the First Information Report is not sufficient to
