the Tribunal has fastened the negligence on the part of the driver of the first respondent, after taking into consideration of evidence adduced on either side. The appellant also not disputed the negligence on the part of the driver of the lorry and only preferred the appeal on the ground of liability. According to the appellant, on the date of accident, more than 20 persons were travelled in the lorry as gratuitous passengers and the owner of the lorry violated the conditions of Insurance Policy and thereby, the appellant Insurance Company is not liable to pay any award amount to the petitioner. In this context, the driver of the first respondent, admitted that on the date of accident, more than 20 persons were travelled in the lorry for going to temple. At the time, 7 persons travelled in the door of the lorry and the chain of the door was broken. Thereby, the accident happened. Therefore, he himself admitted that the petitioner along with others have travelled in the lorry. Therefore, there is a violation of conditions of policy. The Tribunal also after taking into consideration came to a conclusion that there is a violation of conditions of policy. Thereby, considering the nature of the case and the facts and
