A.Soundararajan v. N.Vijayalakshmi
Case brief
What is this about?
First appeal dismissed as the sole appellant died and execution petitions against legal heirs were dismissed, leaving nothing to adjudicate.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
A.S.(MD).No.97 of 2022
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 11.01.2024
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.DHANABAL
A.S(MD)No.97 of 2022 and
C.M.P(MD) No.3512 of 2022
A. Soundararajan ... Appellant/Defendant
-vs-
N.Vijayalakshmi ... Respondent/Plaintiff
PRAYER: First Appeal filed under Section 96 of the Civil Procedure Code, challenging the judgment and decree passed in O.S.No.233 of 2018, dated 24.08.2021 on the file of the Principal District Court, Dindigul.
For Appellant : Mr.R.G.Shankar Ganesh For Respondent : Mr.A.Arul Jenifar
J U D G M E N T
The present First Appeal has been filed by the appellant challenging the judgment and decree passed in O.S.No.233 of 2018, dated 24.08.2021 on the
file of the Principal District Judge, Dindigul.
1/4
A.S.(MD).No.97 of 2022
2. The learned counsel appearing for the appellant represented that the
sole appellant died. Already Execution Petition was filed and the same was dismissed as against the legal heirs of the appellant. Hence, nothing survives for further adjudication in the first appeal.
3. In view of the above said submission, this First Appeal is dismissed.
There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.
11.01.2024
NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No ebsi
2/4
A.S.(MD).No.97 of 2022
To
3/4
A.S.(MD).No.97 of 2022
P.DHANABAL,J.
ebsi
A.S(MD)No.97 of 2022
11.01.2024
4/4
1 provisions across 1 enactments
A. Soundararajan
N.Vijayalakshmi
P.DHANABAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court