Civil Miscellaneous Appeals filed under the Family Courts Act were dismissed for non-prosecution as the appellant failed to appear on the hearing date despite listing for dismissal. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions were closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.M.A.(MD)Nos.1003 to 1005 of 2017
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 29.08.2024
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.K.RAMAKRISHNAN
C.M.A.(MD)Nos.1003 to 1005 of 2017 & C.M.P.(MD)Nos.10335 & 10336 of 2017
S.S.Seshan ...Appellant in all appeals
vs.
K.Adhelakshmi ... Respondent in all appeals
Prayer in C.M.A(MD)No.1003 of 2017: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act praying to set aside the Judgment and Decree dated 30.01.2017 passed by the Family Court Judge, Tiruchirappalli in H.M.O.P.No.874 of 2014 by allowing this appeal.
Prayer in C.M.A(MD)No.1004 of 2017: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 19(1) of the Family Courts Act praying to set aside the fair and decreetal order dated 28.11.2016 in I.A.No.15 of 2015 in H.M.O.P.No.874 of 2014 on the file of the Family Court, Tiruchirappalli and allow the appeal.
Page 1 of 4
C.M.A.(MD)Nos.1003 to 1005 of 2017
Prayer in C.M.A(MD)No.1005 of 2017: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 19(1) of the Family Courts Act praying to set aside the fair and decreetal order dated 22.11.2016 in I.A.No.16 of 2015 in H.M.O.P.No.874 of 2014 on the file of the Family Court, Tiruchirappalli and allow the appeal.
In all appeals,
For Appellant : No appearance For Respondent : Mr.K.Lakshmi Shankar
JUDGMENT
(Judgment of the Court was delivered by P.VELMURUGAN, J.)
When the appeals came up for hearing on last occasion, i.e., on 21.08.2024, there was no representation for the appellant. Hence, the appeals were directed to be listed under the caption for dismissal on 29.08.2024.
2. Today also, there is no representation for the appellant. The
learned counsel for the respondent is present.
Page 2 of 4
C.M.A.(MD)Nos.1003 to 1005 of 2017
3. In view of the same, the Civil Miscellaneous Appeals are dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.
(P.V., J.) (K.K.R.K., J.) 29.08.2024
NCC:Yes/No Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order
mbi
To
1.The Family Court, Madurai
2.The Section Officer, Vernacular Records Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
Page 3 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
C.M.A.(MD)Nos.1003 to 1005 of 2017
P.VELMURUGAN, J. and K.K.RAMAKRISHNAN, J.
mbi
C.M.A.(MD)Nos.1003 to 1005 of 2017
29.08.2024
Page 4 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
S.S.Seshan
K.Adhelakshmi
P.Velmurugan
K.K.Ramakrishnan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
