amendment, the appellant has become a co parcenor and since the property was not divided on the date of the amendment, the appellant is entitled to share on par with the respondent. As per the amended Act,2005, female member has become co parcenor on par with the male member. Though the learned counsel for the respondent would submit that succession opens on the date of death of the father itself, however, in the case of Vineeta Sharma as cited supra, the date of death of the father is immaterlal and admittedly, the suit property is an ancestral property and father died in the year 1983 and the property continued to be an undivided property even after the amended Act, 2005 came into force and therefore, as per the amended Act,2005, the appellant is also entitled to equal share on par with the respondent, since the appellant has become a co parcenor. The property is also admittedly an ancestral property. Therefore, on the date of amended Act, 2005 came into force, admittedly the property continued to be an undivided joint family property. As per the provisions of Section 6 of the amended Act, 2005, the appellant has become a co parcenor and she is entitled to equal share on par with the male member. Section 6 of the amended Act,2005, reads as under:
